5 legal questions have been posted about real estate by real users in New Mexico. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include easements, commercial leasing, and commercial real estate. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
New Mexico Real Estate Questions & Legal Answers
Do you have any New Mexico Real Estate questions and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 5 previously answered New Mexico Real Estate questions.
Answered 9 years ago by Stephen Dean Ingram (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Real Estate
Are they paying rent? Assuming no written lease, deemed to be month-to-month. Give them notice of termination of tenancy under landlord-tenant act, followed by suit in metro or magistrate court (as appropriate) to evict them. Once get judgment, sheriff can physcially move them out. Going to be difficult since they live with you, apparently.
This is for informational purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.... Read More
Are they paying rent? Assuming no written lease, deemed to be month-to-month. Give them notice of termination of tenancy under... Read More
Answered 9 years ago by Stephen Dean Ingram (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Real Estate
Landlord had to give you accounting within 30 days after last day of lease with deductions from deposit. If not, landlord forfeits right to keep any of deposit, and forfeits right to go after you for alleged damages to property. If he did give 30-day notice, probably have to fight him in metro or magistrate court over whether damage charges are legitimate.
This is for information purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.... Read More
Landlord had to give you accounting within 30 days after last day of lease with deductions from deposit. If not, landlord forfeits right... Read More
Answered 14 years ago by Mr. Charles Eddie Isom (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Real Estate
Your facts are not stated clearly enough for me to understand what the state of title was prior to adding the child's name, or why the "loan" against the property should make any difference.
Let me just say that, by adding the name of a minor to the title makes that child an "part owner" of the property. The child become an owner just like the other owners. To remove the child's name is to take the ownership interest away from the child. No one has the right to do that and no one should have the right to do that --- without paying the child a fair market price for the asset taken away from him. When a proposal is made in court to do that, the court will always require that the child be represented in court by a court-appointed lawyer called a Guardian ad litem. That lawyer's job is to protect the interests of the child. In this case, the lawyer's job would be to see that the child is fairly compensated for his loss of an ownership interest.
It is not relevant that it might have been a "mistake" to have added the child's name to the title. Doing so created an ownership interest. (Now, there may be a way to challenge the validity of the deed into the child by showing there was no consideration for the transfer. An attack on the validity of the original transfer would have to be defended by the Guardian ad litem. ... Read More
Your facts are not stated clearly enough for me to understand what the state of title was prior to adding the child's name, or why the "loan" against... Read More