Whether it is a good idea to list your trust as the beneficiary of your 401(k) depends on your objectives, your family situation, and the language in your trust.
Generally speaking, there are a number of options with regard to naming your beneficiary. You could name your trust, a spouse, or, with your spouse's permission, anyone other than your spouse, as beneficiary of a 401(k). If your spouse is the beneficiary, he or she will have the option of treating the 401(k) distribution as a roll-over. That means your spouse can "stretch" the distributions from the 401(k) over the spouse's life expectancy, rather than take a lump sum immediate distribution, or take a distribution of the entire balance within five years of the date of death - the other options typically available. Stretching the distributions over the spouse's life expectancy will reduce the ultimate tax burden and allow the beneficiary to take advantage of the tax deferred growth of the 401(k) account.
If your trust has the appropriate langauge, then you can accomplish the same result with the trust with respect to the stretching of the distributions over the life expectancy of the oldest beneficiary of the trust. However, if the proper language is not in your trust, then the only choices for the trustee of the trust is to either take an immediate distribution of the entire balance of the account, or to complete the distribution from the account within 5 years of the date of death. Those options could result in substantial income tax liability since, with minor exceptions, the full amount of the distribution from a 401(k) is subject to income taxes.
Another consideration, if the beneficiary of your 401(k) is someone other than your spouse, your spouse must sign a waiver of the right the spouse has as the primary beneficiary of the 401(k). In certain states, if you convert the 401(k) to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), the spouse's permission to name someone other than the spouse as the beneficiary is not required.
Ultimately, the question of whether to name the trust as the beneficiary, assuming your trust has the appropriate language, revolves around who are your intended beneficiaries and how much control do you want, or need, to exercise over the distribution.. If your beneficiaries are minor children, by all means the trust is a desirable option. Only through naming the trust as the beneficiary can you avoid a court-supervised guardianship over the property of a minor child. If your spouse is elderly and unable or unwilling to manage the assets appropriately, or may have the need for nursing home care, then the trust is a desirable alternative (with the additional language necessary to create a protective "special needs trust" for the elderly spouse who needs, or may need, protection from nursing home spenddown. The trust will also provide some protection for adult children, or surviving spouses, from creditors or others who may have the opportunity to take advantage of your beneficiary (protection from predators and creditors).
You may find some additional information at our blog: http://blog.thecolemanlawfirm.net/2012/02/29/20120228.aspx
C. Randolph Coleman
...
Read More