Immigration Legal Questions

You can supplement your affidavit of support with the following documents: 1. A letter from your employer verifying employment and the rate of pay. 2. The most recent 6 months of pay stubs from your employer 3. 12 months of bank statements, that show your payroll being deposited into your account from your job. You should either engage counsel to look over your affidavit of support before you file it or even better, you should retain counsel to represent you from start to finish.... Read Answer

A United States green card holder can sponsor a Spouse who is on an F1 student visa. The priority dates for your sons category on the visa bulletin board department of state website is "current" as of today's date. So if his spouse stays "in status", then he could sponsor her and she could file for adjustment of status to get her green card. You should retain counsel anywhere in the United States for legal representation, to handle the case from start to finish.... Read Answer

No, unfortunately, the immediate relative category under which you are filing (US citizen filing for spouse, parent, or child under the age of 21 and unmarried) does not allow for dependents. You will have to file separate petitions. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

Applying under the three year rule has a higher burden of proof than under the five-year rule. For three year citizenship, you must prove that you have been a green card holder for three years (can apply 90 days in advance of the three years); have been married to a US citizen in marital union constantly without separation for three years; and that the US citizen has been a US citizen for the three years. It is common for naturalization examiners to request proof of joint documentation to show that the couple has lived together constantly. USCIS has given you examples of what it will accept. In our practice, we request clients to have at least three pieces of joint evidence for every year in the three years to prove constant living together. From your fact situation, it appears that you have enough evidence to prove that you and your wife have been constantly living together. A joint bank account is only one example of proof that USCIS can accept. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

You should be able to obtain copies of your arrest record from the police authorities in the jurisdiction in which you were arrested in most cases. You may or may not be able to have the arrest record certified. In our experience, USCIS officers generally do not insist upon having an arrest record certified if there is a certified disposition by a court. On the matter of the total amount of days that you were incarcerated, most individuals remember the exact number of days – otherwise, they can give their best guess. The point at which the number of days becomes important may be where there is question as to whether a crime is a felony as opposed to a misdemeanor or whether the crime should be considered an aggravated felony or if an offense can be considered a crime involving moral turpitude with issues of inadmissibility or deportability. In those situations, the exact number of days incarcerated may prove important. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

Automatic extensions for EADs involve the same class of EAD and not different classes. That is because USCIS has already seen the basis for and approved the initial EAD application and is not so concerned about issues of ineligibility when considering an extension. In your case, it saw and considered your STEM extension application previously and so allowed your automatic work extension during the pendency. It will not give the same treatment for your initial EAD based upon adjustment of status, an entirely different basis for benefit. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

As you timely applied for a change of status to F-1 student, you are allowed to remain in the US while awaiting a decision on the change of status request. USCIS last year changed its policy which had previously required B-2 individuals applying for change of status to student to keep maintaining B-2 status and keep filing extension requests until the change of status was adjudicated. Please note, however, that other rules still apply that you cannot become a student until USCIS approves the change, and you are not allowed to work in the US during the pendency of the request. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

Whether your wife obtained her permanent residence through marriage to you or through asylum does not matter in the consideration of whether she can apply on the basis of having been a resident for three years. To take advantage of the rule, she must have been a permanent resident for three years (can apply up to 90 days in advance of the three years); lived in marital union constantly with you during the three year period prior to application; and you must have been a US citizen during the three years. If she meets those conditions, she can qualify for three years citizenship. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

An applicant who is sponsored for immigration has an obligation to make the US the country of permanent domicile. Failure to at least initially come and establish a permanent residence in the US (spending a period of time initially in the States) makes the green card statuses of the dependents insecure and subject to challenge. If your brother first enters the US and stays here for a period of approximately six months, it would make it much harder for DHS to challenge the dependents' statuses even if your brother's green card is taken away at some later point for no longer maintaining status. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

In your fact situation, your case of shoplifting was in August 2015, well over five years old by the time that you applied for your citizenship in January 2022. I also note that you said that you received your permanent residence in 2017, and I assume that you disclosed the shoplifting offense in your immigration application papers. The period of good moral character is five years, and this should not be held against you. I suggest, however, that you obtain a certified copy of the court disposition to take with you to the interview if you have not already presented it as part of your naturalization application.On your other questions, I do not believe that pretrial intervention and dismissal qualify as one of the programs  mentioned in part 12, item 26, if you did not have to make an admission of guilt. Also you should mention the traffic tickets as item 23 of the same part asks whether you have ever been cited, and a traffic ticket is a citation. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

USCIS is attempting in as many ways as it can to reduce backlogs that were caused by the pandemic and the Trump administration. Part of the effort is to reuse the biometrics whenever it can since fingerprints do not change over time. Either you failed to completely read one of the notices saying that the agency would reuse your biometrics or USCIS failed to send that one out or it was lost in the mail. The notice that you now have seems pretty clear in indicating that the agency will reuse your biometrics. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

Although it seems like a very small violation of status, perhaps the best policy is to put it down and explain exactly what happened in your application. I imagine that most consular officers would not hold such a small infraction against you. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

There is no rule written or unwritten that prevents a petition being filed for persons who are presently in the US and will quickly return overseas and await consular processing. In point of fact, we have done many cases over the years involving the same situation with no detrimental effect for our clients. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

If any of your children are aged 21, they could perhaps sponsor you for permanent residence. Other than that, there is too little in your fact situation to give an opinion as to whether you be able to receive your immigration papers in the future. I suggest that you should consult with an immigration lawyer to go over your options. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

Your fact situation is confusing to me as you say that the application was denied, that you did not file another application, but that you do have an approved form I-130. The confusion lies in your stating that your father filed for you, a married person, when he only had the green card – and that would be a filing that does not conform with the law of eligibility. Nevertheless, assuming that an I-130 petition was approved at some point for you prior to the time of your father’s passing away, and you were in the US at the time, that petition might be a basis for a permanent residence application. As the facts are unclear, I suggest that you should consult with an immigration lawyer to go over your entire situation and for him or her to explore with you any steps that might be able to be taken. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

A US consular officer does not have the authority to overlook grounds of inadmissibility. If your father was deported previously, one question is whether he served out the entire time of the bar before coming back to the US. When he reentered the US, did he enter legally or illegally? If he entered illegally before April 1, 1997, he would be eligible to file waiver applications after his interview with the US consulate. On the other hand, if he reentered illegally on or after that date, he would have incurred a permanent bar under which he will not be able to request permission to return to the US as an immigrant until 10 years after he left the US a couple of years ago. The granting of permission to reapply at that point would be in the discretion of the Attorney General. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.  ... Read Answer

There is no guarantee that you will be allowed to have your stamping done for the H-1B visa in London. There is prejudice in most US consulates against giving visas to third country nationals. The good factor that you have on your side is that you have good reason to be in England as your husband’s family is British. You can try, and good luck. You should of course look at the embassy website to see whether there is a stated attitude on third country nationals and the issuance of visas. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer

In our office, we usually put all sons and daughters of the beneficiaries on the I-130 form. I note that the form itself does not limit the term "children"although the Immigration and Nationality Act defines children as being under the age of 21 and unmarried. Also, the form instructions refer to both "unmarried children"and "married children". Additionally, some of our clients are uncomfortable with the idea of leaving out any of the 21+-year-old children, and so we generally include them. If there is a reason for which our clients do not wish to mention such children, we will leave them out. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee & Arthur Lee, Esqs.’ (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read Answer