17 legal questions have been posted about intellectual property by real users in Massachusetts. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include copyrights, intellectual property licensing, and patents. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
Do you have any Massachusetts Intellectual Property questions and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 17 previously answered Massachusetts Intellectual Property questions.
Royalties charged for the use of intellectual property vary widely. If an intellectual property is foremost in defining or providing the functionality of a product or service, the royalty fee may be a substantial percentage of the revenue received for the product or service by the licensee. Alternatively, if the licensed IP is merely incidential to the covered product or service, the royalty payment is typically a much smaller portion of the gross revenue for the covered item.
Payment terms also may vary. In come cases, a substantial sum is paid up front when the license is granted. In many cases, royalties are simply paid periodically as a percentage of sales. Many royaltiy agreeements combinde minimum periodic payments with additional remitance of a percentage of sales.
Carefully drafted royalty agreements focus on gross sales of the licensee rather than profits of the licensee, because determination of gross sales is much more ascertainable than a determination of profits (profit figures can be manipulated with clever bookkeeping, while gross sales are pretty easily verified).
I am available to review your royalty arrangement and offer an opinion whether, in light of the facts particular to your case, the arrangement seems fair and workable.
Anthony Claiborne
Claiborne Intellectual Property Law Services
425.533.6132... Read More
Royalties charged for the use of intellectual property vary widely. If an intellectual property is foremost in defining or providing the... Read More
Answered 9 years and 7 months ago by Ms. Lisa A Dunner (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
You may. We would have to see all of the facts, but under copyright law, the works at issue need only be "substantially similar," and you would also have to prove that the other company had "access" to your character, which, if it was visible online, you could possibly prove. You have copyright protection even without having registered it with the copyright office, but if you were to pursue an infringement in court, you would be required to register your copyright first, and then you still would not be entitled to statutory damages, although you would be entitled to other money damages, but the proof would be more difficult.... Read More
You may. We would have to see all of the facts, but under copyright law, the works at issue need only be "substantially similar," and you would... Read More
Answered 11 years and 6 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
Absent a contract with your employer explicitly indicating the employer has a right to works you create or the specific work you created, ownership of a work can only pass to the employer if it is a work made for hire. See http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ09.pdf. From the facts you provided, it does not appear this matter is a work for hire and you should retain ownership, although additional facts could change that opinion.
Good luck,
Todd... Read More
Absent a contract with your employer explicitly indicating the employer has a right to works you create or the specific work you created, ownership... Read More
Answered 11 years and 10 months ago by David Scott Safran (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
Once the copyright in a work expires, others are free to use it in any manner that they like. For example, the producers of all of those Jane Austin based movies pay no royalties to anyone for the right to make a movie of her books.
Once the copyright in a work expires, others are free to use it in any manner that they like. For example, the producers of all of those Jane Austin... Read More
Invention rights vest first in the inventor(s). Intellectual property rights can only be conveyed by a signed writing. If you are paid to create something, shop rights in the patent could be obtained by the entity paying you. If the school was not paying you and you did not sign an agreement to convey patent rights, I cannot think of any other means by which your invention rights could become the property of the school.
If it is a public school, the school is treated as a part of the government and is held to a higher standard under the Constitution to prevent government taking from private citizens. There may be additional facts that create an ownership dispute, but nothing in your details suggests the school has accrued any intellectual property rights in your project. ... Read More
Invention rights vest first in the inventor(s). Intellectual property rights can only be conveyed by a signed writing. If you are paid to create... Read More
If this happened to me, I would register some of the artwork with the Copyright Office. The forms are very simple and available at www.copyright.gov. It costs $35 to file a copyright application. If it is infringed after you file the application, you can receive statutory damages and the infringer can be responsible for paying for your attorney. Save a copy of the application(s) you file.
I would also send the author a letter, saving a copy, informing the author that he is not authorized to use the work.
If, despite your letter, he does use your work, contact an IP attorney to resolve the matter by getting an injunction and/or damages.... Read More
If this happened to me, I would register some of the artwork with the Copyright Office. The forms are very simple and available at www.copyright.gov.... Read More
Answered 12 years and 2 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
This is a real estate question and/or a trust and estates question, not an intellectual property question. If your family was putting a trademark in your name, that's an IP question.
This is a real estate question and/or a trust and estates question, not an intellectual property question. If your family was putting a trademark in... Read More
Answered 12 years and 2 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
The owner could have Customs stop importation from Mexico based on trademark and/or copyright laws. A copyright lawsuit is also possible and the US has a strong enough economic relationship with Mexico to pull you into a US court (or get a default judgment against you after which your assets in Mexico could be seized).... Read More
The owner could have Customs stop importation from Mexico based on trademark and/or copyright laws. A copyright lawsuit is also possible and the US... Read More
Answered 12 years and 2 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
You are right to be concerned. Their Agreement should be limited to inventions related to their business (check, as the language may already be in place). If this company is in the same line of business as your athletic company, you have a conflict and need to choose one business going forward.
Otherwise, they should be able to accept that IP related to your athletic company will not be assigned over as a result of your employment. You don't need specialized legal language to achieve this goal, but it should be made plain and clear as a written modification (again, if the language is not already in place) in the agreement before you sign it.
Now is the time to avoid a foreseeable problem.
Good luck,
Todd... Read More
You are right to be concerned. Their Agreement should be limited to inventions related to their business (check, as the language may already be in... Read More
Answered 12 years and 3 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
How did they get the video? Do they make clear that it was your video? Defamation is difficult for a few reasons and if you want to reach someone more familiar with it, try asking in business litigation.
It might be more effective to go after them for copyright infringement. If the video is your work, you have a right to register it, and you have a right to control its dissemination. Copyrights are nice in that, if you file an application to register within 3 months of creating the video, you can collect statutory damages that range from $750 to $250,000 per offense. That is the sort of hammer that encourages folks to act quickly.... Read More
How did they get the video? Do they make clear that it was your video? Defamation is difficult for a few reasons and if you want to reach someone... Read More
Answered 12 years and 5 months ago by Todd A. Sullivan (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
The risks here look to me like theft and fraud. Intellectual Property is for patents and trademarks and copyrights. I am not suggesting you did anything criminal, but you will have more luck getting a useful answer if you post your question in the criminal law area.
The risks here look to me like theft and fraud. Intellectual Property is for patents and trademarks and copyrights. I am not suggesting you did... Read More
As a general matter, ideas are not subject to any kind of protection in the United States unless they are kept secret. If, as you say, you were asked to do this work and did so, then the person who paid for the work has the right to use what he paid for.
As a general matter, ideas are not subject to any kind of protection in the United States unless they are kept secret. If, as you say, you were asked... Read More
Answered 13 years and 9 months ago by Nancy J Flint (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
What you are describing could be copyright infringement. You have rights in your photographs under copyright law that include the right to copy, publicly display and make "derivative works" of your photographs. Someone can't make a substantial copy of your photographs without your permission. This includes taking photographs with substantially identical settings. If people are believing that the other photographer's works are your works because they are substantially similar to your works, then you may have a claim under copyright law. You have to register the copyright with the United States Copyright Office before you can enforce the copyright. ... Read More
What you are describing could be copyright infringement. You have rights in your photographs under copyright law that include the right to copy,... Read More
Answered 13 years and 11 months ago by Nancy J Flint (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Intellectual Property
The United States Patent & Trademark Office has a list of registered patent attorneys and patent agents. You can search and find someone in your area. Go to www.uspto.gov and look in the Patents section for Registered Attorneys and Agents.
The United States Patent & Trademark Office has a list of registered patent attorneys and patent agents. You can search and find someone in your... Read More