474 legal questions have been posted about immigration by real users in California. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include asylum, green cards, and consular law. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
California Immigration Questions & Legal Answers - Page 13
Do you have any California Immigration questions page 13 and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 474 previously answered California Immigration questions.
Answered 8 years and 5 months ago by Ms. Evelyne M Hart (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
If you are married to a U.S. Citizen, it is possible that your attorney will get you a green card instead of having you deported. You need to retain an immigration attorney to help you, if you wish to remain in the United States.
Typically, at the first master calendar hearing, you plead to the allegations and state your claims for relief. If you don't have an attorney yet, you can ask the Immigration Judge for an extension to provide you with time to get an attorney.
Let me know if I can be of service. My direct line is (714) 447-1282. My email is ehart@hartimmigration.com
... Read More
If you are married to a U.S. Citizen, it is possible that your attorney will get you a green card instead of having you deported. You need to... Read More
Answered 8 years and 5 months ago by Ms. Evelyne M Hart (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
No, you do not need to be in the USA at the time of your daughter's interview. As the signer of the affidavit of support (I-864), you must be residing in the USA. Best of luck to your daughter and her interview.
No, you do not need to be in the USA at the time of your daughter's interview. As the signer of the affidavit of support (I-864), you must be... Read More
I gather that when you are talking about Uni papers in Saudi Arabia, that refers to your university papers. The USA would not be able to obtain those papers for you – neither would it feel obligated to do so since the burden of proof is upon you to prove your case for asylum. That being said, while US immigration law on asylum does require corroborative evidence, that is only so where it is able to be obtained. If the Uni papers are central to your case and you have a good explanation as to why you cannot obtain them, it would be up to an asylum officer and perhaps an immigration judge to determine your credibility and the availability of the documents.Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
I gather that when you are talking about Uni papers in Saudi Arabia, that refers to your university papers. The USA would not be able to obtain those... Read More
I do not believe that you will find that this is a viable case for a U visa since the incident was not reported to the police two years ago and they would likely not be interested in looking into such a small case in which the perpetrators would likely not be caught.Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
I do not believe that you will find that this is a viable case for a U visa since the incident was not reported to the police two years ago and they... Read More
I will assume that your daughter is overseas as you have asked questions concerning processing by the NVC or Embassy overseas. By this time, you or your daughter should already have received a fee bill from the NVC. You may also have received instructions on how to submit the immigrant visa application, DS 260 and the documents required since the priority date is within the time range for the NVC to send out the bill and DS-260 instructions. If you have not received such, you should communicate either by phone or email with a NVC explaining her entitlement to the eight months under the CSPA. I do note, however, that the NVC in the past has been known to be reluctant give definitive answers where the CSPA is involved until the priority date actually becomes current on the visa bulletin.Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
I will assume that your daughter is overseas as you have asked questions concerning processing by the NVC or Embassy overseas. By this time, you or... Read More
Individuals who are holding valid nonimmigrant status in the US are not required to register for selective service in the US. In your case, you would be maintaining legal nonimmigrant status if you had a valid I-20 and were still attending school on a full-time basis. Expiration of a visa is of no account as the visa is only good for traveling back and forth .Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
Individuals who are holding valid nonimmigrant status in the US are not required to register for selective service in the US. In your case, you would... Read More
Unlawful presence for you begin accruing in May 2017 when U.S.C.I.S. denied your F-1 reinstatement request. For an individual like you with a visa marked duration of status, unlawful presence only begins when you receive formal notice from U.S.C.I.S. of a denial or a negative decision by an immigration court.Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
Unlawful presence for you begin accruing in May 2017 when U.S.C.I.S. denied your F-1 reinstatement request. For an individual like you with a visa... Read More
The likelihood that both will succeed is good so long as the marriage is bona fide. Having the ESTA canceled for an overstay may affect the individual's ability to return to the US under ESTA or a nonimmigrant visa, but it should have no effect upon an immigrant visa petition based upon marriage or through a US citizen child so long as no misrepresentation was made at the time of ESTA entry. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
The likelihood that both will succeed is good so long as the marriage is bona fide. Having the ESTA canceled for an overstay may affect the... Read More
Of course, the petition must be completed truthfully and accurately. More information is needed, however, in order to provide a legal analysis of whether your husband's visa violation (employment without authorization) will stand in the way of eligibility to adjust status to become a Lawful Permanent Resident (to get a "Green Card"). Generally such a violation will be immaterial in a marriage-based case in the Immediate Relative category, but could render your husband ineligible to adjust status in the Second Preference category. This is just one of the details in the application process that can be significantly more complex than it might appear. There really is no substitute for you and your husband to consult with an immigration attorney who, after learning all of the relevant information, could advise about eligibilities, options and strategies to attain your goals, and who then could offer legal representation in the often complex application process.... Read More
Of course, the petition must be completed truthfully and accurately. More information is needed, however, in order to provide a legal analysis of... Read More
Answered 8 years and 6 months ago by Justin Wang (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
If you are in B status, you should file your asylum application as soon as you can but definitely with one year of your entry into the US. Once you file the asylum application, in about 3-4 weeks you will be asked to do finger print; then in 5 months from the date of your filing you may apply for employment authorization. Your interview date may be 2-4 years from the date of your initial asylum application, depending on the location of your residence. in general San Francisco Asylum Office schedules interview faster than other asylum offices. if you pass the interview you receive asylee status and in one year of the approval you can apply for green card. If you do not pass, your case will be referred to immigration court for a de novo review by a judge. If you lose again you may appeal your case to the Board of Immigration Appeals. After that, if you lose your appeal, you may file petition for review in federal circuit court of appeals. The best chance to win your case is at the asylum office. If you have good immigration lawyer with experience in your country's condition, you should prevail.... Read More
If you are in B status, you should file your asylum application as soon as you can but definitely with one year of your entry into the US. Once you... Read More
Answered 8 years and 6 months ago by Alexander Joseph Segal (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
There is not enough information to answer your title question. For instance we have no idea who long out of those 4 years you have been holding your LPR status.
There is not enough information to answer your title question. For instance we have no idea who long out of those 4 years you have been holding your... Read More
The EAD gives you open market employment under which you can work for any employer. However, changing jobs could bring up the question of whether you intend to work for your employer after obtaining your permanent residence. Many NIW's are filed by the individuals themselves who act as both the petitioner and beneficiary. The fact that your employer sponsored you on the I-140 for the NIW complicates your situation. To your other question, you are allowed to start a business with the open market employment, but if you spend significant time working in the business, that could raise doubts as to whether you intend to work for your sponsoring employer when you obtain your permanent residence card. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.... Read More
The EAD gives you open market employment under which you can work for any employer. However, changing jobs could bring up the question of whether you... Read More
Answered 8 years and 6 months ago by Dina Jayne Sakita White (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
Our office provides case assessments for eligibility for the EB-1 Oustanding Researcher and Extraordinary Ability category. We would need to review your CV and any supporting materials you may have. Please feel free to contact our office at info@madisonpiper.com.
Our office provides case assessments for eligibility for the EB-1 Oustanding Researcher and Extraordinary Ability category. We would need to review... Read More
Regardless of the time that you have been married to a permanent resident and the number of children that you have with her, the amount of time to apply for citizenship is five years unless your wife becomes a US citizen. Then you can count three years from that date and can file 90 days before the three years as long as you have both been living together without significant break during the three-year period.Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
... Read More
Regardless of the time that you have been married to a permanent resident and the number of children that you have with her, the amount of time to... Read More
Laws addressing naturalization place no limit on the number of times an applicant may apply, nor on the time following a denial by which an applicant may apply. In your case that the USCIS denied, there apparently was some issue or issues that led to the USCIS requiring you to attend a second interview - a rare complication. Additionally, I presume there was some unusual reason that led you to fail to attend your interview - perhaps even a reason that would justify re-opening your denied case. It would be wise for you to consult with an immigration attorney who, after learning all of the relevant information, could advise about eligibilities, options and strategies to attain your goals, and who then could offer legal representation in the often complex application process.... Read More
Laws addressing naturalization place no limit on the number of times an applicant may apply, nor on the time following a denial by which an applicant... Read More
Answered 8 years and 7 months ago by Justin Wang (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Immigration
It's better to come after your h1 extension is approved so they can stay based on the new date; otherwise they will be allowed to stay till October of 2017 and after your h1 extension is approved they will have to either leave by their I-94 date or they will have to file I-539 to extend their stay.... Read More
It's better to come after your h1 extension is approved so they can stay based on the new date; otherwise they will be allowed to stay till October... Read More