Florida Recent Legal Answers from Lawyers

None. All pets means what it says. Not "all pets unless your pet doesnt like being restrained or the owner doesn't want to." If you cat is treated as a "feral cat" and you let it "roam" it is subject to being picked up by animal control and destroyed. The idea of "clipped ear" is a procedure performed by a vet that IDs the cat as having been spayed and fully vaccinated, so that AC might not pick it up for population control. If your cat is "roaming" unrestrained and uncollered- it IS in fact a feral cat to others who have no idea about your cat, regardless of whether you like the designation. Your other remedy is to move elsewhere, get rid of the cat or risk being fined and sued for violation of the community rules. ... Read Answer

If this happened in a home you own, it’s generally difficult to bring a negligent security claim against a third party like a landlord or property manager. Those cases require proof that the property owner knew the crime was foreseeable and failed to take reasonable security steps, a theory that usually doesn’t apply to a single‑family home you control. Your main civil claim is typically against the perpetrators, or any third party who may be legally responsible for them through an employer employee or similar agency relationship. This platform doesn’t allow attorney solicitation, but you’re free to review the profiles of the lawyers who answer here and contact one of us prto see whether your situation supports a viable civil case under Florida law.... Read Answer

Unfortunately, none of what you described is the responsibility of the funeral home. If you were separated  and not readily available- this is one of the issues that arise that you will simply have to contend with. If you expect to address any of the issues in probate as the widowed spouse, you will likely need to retain a probate lawyer to address that ASAP. Especially if "the family" is not excited about any claims you might make to an estate if you were estranged. ... Read Answer

This is not a case most lawyers would consider, especially as a defamation case, unless it was UNDENIABLE that the allegations were completely fabricated. Just because you were found "not guilty" of a criminal charge does NOT equate to innocence nor does it avoid the "where there is smoke there is fire" aspect of public opinion in general. All you can do is simply keep contactoing lawyers until you find one that might be interested that you can afford to hire or that you satisfy yourself that its not a viable case to pursue. Understand however, that unlike a criminal trial, where you have 5th amendment privilege - you DO NOT generally have that in a civil trial postured as yours would be - which can be problematic if the defendants dig deep in to your past and internet history and might find unsavory issues or events. I point this out because people often fantacize that people being sued will not find out other details that might be embarrassing or humiliating and the scope of the civil discovery is often far greater than that in a criminal case. ... Read Answer

Just as a heads up - most competent and coherent lawyers will not take such cases on a contingent fee (get paid when and if you win) especially against an individual. The ability to collect on judgments is exceptionally low. Most lawyers have little interest in working for free. This is likely why the original lawyer declined to go further. ... Read Answer

  I am sorry to hear about your injury. Do not delay contacting an experienced attorney who can discuss with you in a private consultation. If this is not deemed a Workers' Compensation matter, a Personal Injury attorney can determine if there is a potentially viable liability claim. We all give free consultations and if we take the case, it would be on a contingent fee basis. Start this process with a free consultation. Better sooner rather than later. We cannot solicit you, so you will have to reach out.... Read Answer

  While you still have time, you should consult an experienced Personal Injury attorney for guidance and advice before going any further. We all give free consultations and if we take the case, it would be on a contingent fee basis. However, you will have to reach out, as attorneys are unable to directly solicit.... Read Answer

You should consult with a personal injury attorney here in Florida to review all the facts of your case and explore the possibility of representation on a contingency fee basis. A contingency fee means you pay nothing unless you win. Even though video evidence does not exist, you can still pursue a claim that the other party was at fault for your injuries. Please note that lawyers on this platform are prohibited from soliciting cases, so you would need to research our backgrounds and reach out directly.     ... Read Answer

You may have a claim against the person who threw the log and/or the person who owned the home where you were working that day. Homeowners insurance/Commercial policies may be a source of recovery but they would need to be reviewed. Attorneys on this platform are prohibited from soliciting cases so you would need to research our backgrounds and reach out to one of us.  Stephen Black, Esq. 407-581-2581 ... Read Answer

That makes no sense. Typically a claims for legal fees has to be made to the court within 30 days fo rendition of the judgment, which means you would gave gotten some notice of the claim. That said, if there is to be a court hearing you have a right to challenge the award of legal fees, and you shoudl discuss this with the lawyer than handled your underlying case. Otherwise, if you were pro-se you will need to now spend money on damage control and what that may entail, including bankruptcy is a different discussion. ... Read Answer

No idea what you are talking about. There is no legal case "with y'all" when you are posting on a legal Q&A forum nor would there be a case waiting for 20 years to settle. There is no way to find out "whats goin on" unless you are able to identify exactly which lawyer you claim was representing you and you would need to ask them, not random people on the internet. ... Read Answer

If you paid the rent in full for November then the LL cannot terminate the tenancy early. Florida law doe snot recognize a prorated or per diem rent on a month to month tenancy. If you paid less than the full rent, absent written or credible evidence of an agreement for less than the full month, the landlord would be entitled to serve a 3 day notice and sue for eviction on the 4th day. Your facts seem to suggest that you did not pay rent on the 1st when due, then on the 6th claim some agreement was made to pay for the REMAINING 2 weeks, with a vacation date of the 22nd. Then, we are expected to beleive that arbitrarily the LL demanded that you vacate 3 days later on the 9th? That sounds a lot like a 3 day notice for nonpayment of rent. As to actually towing your car, the landlord is not allowed to do that unless or until you are dispossed of the property legally such as an eviction, absent you parking the vehicle illegaly or without permission. That you called the police on the landlord makes clear there is much more to this issue than related as LL/T interaction does not degrade from courtesy agreements to pro-rate your rent to police being called in a matter of days without something happening. That "something" is likely a critical factor in who is entitled or obligated to do what. ... Read Answer

Dear Anonymous: You are 100% correct that Florida's  equitable distribution laws begin with the premise that all marital assets and liabilites are equally divided.  That said, since the property in question is owned jointly, but in another state, a Florida court could not  order that it be sold and divided Now you don't say you are planning to divorce.  But, you could  have a postnuptial agreement drafted where a) if the marriage doesn't work you could plan now as to  what would happen to the property and b) if you live "till death do you part" determine what would happen to the property upon the first to die.  For example, if you predeceased your wife you could provide that the Illinois property would be left to your wife, who could then dispose of the property as she chooses. Alternatively, the postnup could dispose of the property in another way when both of you pass that you could agree upon now. The difference with estate planning, is that the individual who creates the plan can change the plan in the future.  With a postnuptial it can only be changed if both parties agree. Before you make any decisions, it would be wise to  speak with an attorney who you could discuss all of the facts to help you make the right decision. Best of luck. Cindy S. Vova Family Law Offices of Cindy S. Vova, P.A. Broward:/Miami Dade: 954-316-3496    Boca Raton:  561-962-2785 www.vovalaw.com... Read Answer