296 legal questions have been posted about personal injury by real users in Michigan. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include boating accidents, nursing home litigation, and automobile accidents. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
Michigan Personal Injury Questions & Legal Answers - Page 8
Do you have any Michigan Personal Injury questions page 8 and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 296 previously answered Michigan Personal Injury questions.
Answered 9 years and 5 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
When someone puts a food product into "the stream of commerce," it is guaranteed to be "fit for the purpose intended." Namely, that it is fit to eat. So, you have a claim based on 2 legal principles: 1) breach of a business contract for the purchase and sale of an edible product, and 2) breach of the guarantee the the product is fit for the purpose intended. However, you MUST prove that the food "contamination" actually is NOT candy. Example: you bite into a piece of cherry pie and break your tooth on a cherry pit. No case, because cherries have pits, and the fact is that sometimes a cherry pit ends up in cherry pie. But, if you break your tooth on a rock, there is a case, because the only way a rock could end up in cherry pie is if someone screwed up.... Read More
When someone puts a food product into "the stream of commerce," it is guaranteed to be "fit for the purpose intended." Namely, that it is fit to eat.... Read More
Answered 9 years and 5 months ago by Michael G Heilmann (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
I am not sure what is wrong with your child but you might be a bit more patient unless you have medical training. Why don't you ask the doctor why he wanted the child admitted. There is no "case" as your child has not been hurt.
I am not sure what is wrong with your child but you might be a bit more patient unless you have medical training. Why don't you ask the doctor why... Read More
Answered 9 years and 5 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
What is wrong with your daughter? How old is your daughter? The doctor and the hospital are undoubtedly concerned about her health. Unless you can prove that they are acting unreasonably, you should just "cool it," and let the professionals do what they do best. If she is a child (under 18 years) then they are acting in HER best interest. If she is over 18, she can walk out. Everyone is entitled to be an idiot, when they are acting for themselves, however, if you are acting for her, and she is incapable of making her own decisions, you are not allowed to be an idiot if it will impact her life, her health, or her safety.... Read More
What is wrong with your daughter? How old is your daughter? The doctor and the hospital are undoubtedly concerned about her health. Unless you can... Read More
Answered 9 years and 6 months ago by James S. Lawrence (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Under federal law no person with a felony conviction may legally possess a firearm. The more favorable state law provisions are worthless because they do not overcome federal law, and the federal government does not defer to state law on firearms, like they usually do on marijuana. If you want to possess a firearm legally in the US, you will have to overturn the conviction, either by court action, or by a pardon from the governor.... Read More
Under federal law no person with a felony conviction may legally possess a firearm. The more favorable state law provisions are worthless because... Read More
Answered 9 years and 6 months ago by Gregory M. Janks (Unclaimed Profile) |
3 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Turn the matter over to your car insurer and any insurer of the rental vehicle and let them sort out which insurer would be responsible to defend the claims against you.
Turn the matter over to your car insurer and any insurer of the rental vehicle and let them sort out which insurer would be responsible to defend... Read More
Answered 9 years and 6 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
3 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
If you had insurance in force on the car you were driving, either insurance you bought when you rented the car, or insurance on your own car, then notify your insurance company about the incident AND the document you received. If you did not have insurance, then you have a problem, and will need to hire a lawyer in the city where the accident happened.... Read More
If you had insurance in force on the car you were driving, either insurance you bought when you rented the car, or insurance on your own car, then... Read More
Answered 9 years and 6 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
You would have to prove that the company knew, or should have known, that the employee was a thief. If you have the employee's identity, go to the police and report him/her. Don't tell the company yet; if they fire the person, you'll never get any money.
You would have to prove that the company knew, or should have known, that the employee was a thief. If you have the employee's identity, go to the... Read More
Answered 9 years and 6 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Definitely go to the police and report it. If YOU have property damage insurance on your car, take a copy of the police report and make a report to your insurance company. If you do not have insurance, then sue the neighbor in small claims court. If your car was lawfully parked, you should win.... Read More
Definitely go to the police and report it. If YOU have property damage insurance on your car, take a copy of the police report and make a report to... Read More
Answered 9 years and 7 months ago by Timothy J. Klisz (Unclaimed Profile) |
3 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Take your dog to the vet to find out what's going on, medically. After that, if it was caused by the groomer, you can sue them for bills. Likely under $5000 would be in small claims court.
Take your dog to the vet to find out what's going on, medically. After that, if it was caused by the groomer, you can sue them for bills. Likely... Read More
Answered 9 years and 7 months ago by Michael G Heilmann (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
You were at fault. There is no way out as you were operating the car which in turn makes you responsible for it. The brake line issue does not leave you off the hook. You always have to have control of your car.
You were at fault. There is no way out as you were operating the car which in turn makes you responsible for it. The brake line issue does not leave... Read More
Answered 9 years and 7 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
You can sue the doctor IF: 1) you can prove that he "deviated from the standard of practice in the same or similar communities, and 2) that you sustained injuries/damages as a direct result, and 3) the value of the case is sufficient to not only cover the costs of the suit, but also enough so that the lawyer can make a reasonable return for the time and effort. In Michigan, claims for pain and suffering are capped at about $380,000, give or take. Usually, after costs are reimbursed, there is not enough to justify the time and effort, but you certainly can ask a competent lawyer. In Michigan, a suit MUST be filed within two (2) years of the date on which the malpractice occurred, or within six (6) months of when it was discovered or should have been discovered, so you do not have time to waste.... Read More
You can sue the doctor IF: 1) you can prove that he "deviated from the standard of practice in the same or similar communities, and 2) that you... Read More
Answered 9 years and 8 months ago by Michael G Heilmann (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Virginia may be different than MI. In general, all heirs get notice of the hearing for the distribution and objections to the proposed distribution must be made to to the court if a sibling does not believe they are receiving a fair share if the proposed distribution. Obviously if the Executor of the estate did not know where you lived, they couldn't give notice. You may need to hire a VA lawyer to file objection to the proposal.... Read More
Virginia may be different than MI. In general, all heirs get notice of the hearing for the distribution and objections to the proposed distribution... Read More
Answered 9 years and 8 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
It depends on the cause of death. If the death is accident related, then yes, the case becomes a wrongful death claim. If not, then unless the deceased was subjected to a deposition so that their testimony was preserved, the death would likely terminate the case because there would be no testimony as to how the accident impacted the victim.... Read More
It depends on the cause of death. If the death is accident related, then yes, the case becomes a wrongful death claim. If not, then unless the... Read More
Answered 9 years and 8 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
In Michigan, you stick your head between your knees and kiss your butt good bye. It's against the law to operate an uninsured vehicle on the roadways and so you have no rights.
In Michigan, you stick your head between your knees and kiss your butt good bye. It's against the law to operate an uninsured vehicle on the... Read More
Answered 9 years and 8 months ago by Michael G Heilmann (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
In Michigan it is probably a question of judgment. You have six months from the date of discovery to take action but in no event more than six years.
In Michigan it is probably a question of judgment. You have six months from the date of discovery to take action but in no event more than six... Read More
Answered 9 years and 8 months ago by Ronald A. Steinberg (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
| Legal Topics: Personal Injury
Yes, it is malpractice, and if you have a problem as a result of the second surgery, you will have a good case. As it is, it may be too small to handle.
Yes, it is malpractice, and if you have a problem as a result of the second surgery, you will have a good case. As it is, it may be too small to... Read More