478 legal questions have been posted about medical malpractice by real users. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include dental malpractice, birth injuries, and failure to diagnose. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
Medical Malpractice Questions & Legal Answers - Page 18
Do you have any Medical Malpractice questions page 18 and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 478 previously answered Medical Malpractice questions.
First of all, you wrote that he told the staff he needed to step outside for fresh air. Nobody sent him out. He should've stayed where he was. The hospital staff was under no obligation to restrain him. They did nothing wrong.
Second, it's too late. The statute of limitations for medical malpractice is 2 1/2 years from the time of the malpractice. If you sued on a theory of negligence that's 3 years, but it's still too late. I'm sure you've already heard this from other lawyers. Let it go. It's too late, and the hospital did nothing wrong.... Read More
First of all, you wrote that he told the staff he needed to step outside for fresh air. Nobody sent him out. He should've stayed where he was. The... Read More
Answered 8 years and 7 months ago by Patrick Johnson (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Medical Malpractice
From a legal perspective, there is nothing to be done unless you have permanent injuries. I would suggest that you go see another dentist for a 2nd opinion on the TMJ issue.
From a legal perspective, there is nothing to be done unless you have permanent injuries. I would suggest that you go see another dentist for a 2nd... Read More
You would want to speak with a medical malpractice attorney. Of course, it would be very important to have further details regarding the procedure you underwent in order to know if this iss the best avenue for you. Please feel free to contact me with further details so that we may better assist you.... Read More
You would want to speak with a medical malpractice attorney. Of course, it would be very important to have further details regarding the... Read More
Its is what it is - if you need to two more procedures, whether you want to or not, that may well be appropriate depending on your situation. If you don't want them you can't be forced to get them, but there is nothing inherently wrong with the medical care with the facts described. I fyou have concerns you can seek a second opinion. Also, to be clear, no one can "make you break down in tears" thats some thing that is within your control andthere is no lawsuit for such things.... Read More
Its is what it is - if you need to two more procedures, whether you want to or not, that may well be appropriate depending on your situation. If you... Read More
Answered 8 years and 7 months ago by Patrick Johnson (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Medical Malpractice
A health care liability lawsuit against the health care provided is a mixture of law and medicine. While I know the law, the medicine part is why we bring in medical experts in cases like this. I can't tell you if your have a case or not until all of the records are gathered together and presented to a medical expert for that expert to review and give an opinion as to whether there was a breach of a standard of care or not and whether that breach was the proxmate cause of your father's death.... Read More
A health care liability lawsuit against the health care provided is a mixture of law and medicine. While I know the law, the medicine part is why we... Read More
I would think that a release of your children's medical records to your spouse or in custody litigation, to a court appointed guardian ad litem, would include only their records, and not contain your personal medical records. For the release of your medical records, a proper release signed by you would be required.... Read More
I would think that a release of your children's medical records to your spouse or in custody litigation, to a court appointed guardian ad litem,... Read More
"I also have mental issues such as depression, anxiety and PTSD and the nurses kept blaming my breathing on my mental health." and there is the elephant in the room. You will need to have a psychiatrist and/or a doctor back this up. Otherwise your post absolutley suggests either a mental health disorder or an inmate working the prison system for infirmary time or contrived claims and won't get anywhere past that absent some other compelling evidence. ... Read More
"I also have mental issues such as depression, anxiety and PTSD and the nurses kept blaming my breathing on my mental health." and there is the... Read More
Very sorry for the loss of your mother. What happened, how, and when? There's no way to tell if you have a malpractice case, usually, unless the records are reviewed- but some things are clearly malpractice by definition. Please provide information.
Very sorry for the loss of your mother. What happened, how, and when? There's no way to tell if you have a malpractice case, usually, unless the... Read More
Whether or not there is a medical malpractice case depends on several factors. A medical professional in the same area of expertise as the doctor who committed the malpractice must be able to testify, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the doctor in question violated the standard of care by something they did or failed to do, and but for the mistake, your granddaughter would not have suffered the permanent injury that she currently has.
If a doctor has suggested that mistakes were made that hurt your granddaughter, it may be worthwhile to have her medical records reviewed by a medical malpractice attorney. Keep in mind that the statute of limitations to start a medical malpractice action is 2 1/2 years from the time of the malpractice.... Read More
Whether or not there is a medical malpractice case depends on several factors. A medical professional in the same area of expertise as the doctor who... Read More
Difficult, as whether the discharge would have prevented the third stroke will take review of all the records and the medication he was on, and then an expert opinion. if by way worse he has now permanent serious physical changes and/or coginitive or other brain injury which affects him permanently then you may want to consult a lawyer and get the records. If your husband cannot sign a medical release for the records, it may be more complicated to obtain unless in going to the hospital he signed a form indiciating that his condition can be shared with you. In either case, you will need to have a final assessment of his condition to determine the extent of the damage or harm and if permanent. Too many facts, but if your question is whether there is malpractice, unknown without the records being reviewed and then a medical opinion. ... Read More
Difficult, as whether the discharge would have prevented the third stroke will take review of all the records and the medication he was on, and then... Read More
Answered 8 years and 7 months ago by Patrick Johnson (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Medical Malpractice
They don't normally go to the specialists office with you, so don't be offended. I would contact whom they referred you to because if you want to somebody else, please be aware that any other specialists is going to be reluctant to get involved while the ones that he referred you to will be aware of the situation.... Read More
They don't normally go to the specialists office with you, so don't be offended. I would contact whom they referred you to because if you want to... Read More
Your opinion as a nurse is of little consequence. You will need a formal written opinion of a cardiologist supporting your contention and then go from there.
Your opinion as a nurse is of little consequence. You will need a formal written opinion of a cardiologist supporting your contention and then go... Read More
From these facts there is a reason to obtain the records and consult a lawyer. No one can determine negligence without reviewing the records and obtaining opinions by a medical expert.
From these facts there is a reason to obtain the records and consult a lawyer. No one can determine negligence without reviewing the records... Read More
Unfortunately many infections are part of the risk of surgery including and especially in replacement surgeries. Pseudomonas is from my reading being found in study in 25 percent of replacement surgeries
You need another medical opinion on whether anything can be done and if anything wrong with the surgery or hardware then if still questions get your records and meet with a pi lawyer as without the records it's impossible to evaluate
... Read More
Unfortunately many infections are part of the risk of surgery including and especially in replacement surgeries. Pseudomonas is from my reading... Read More
Answered 8 years and 7 months ago by Patrick Johnson (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
| Legal Topics: Medical Malpractice
I can not tell you if you have a case or not because a health care liability lawsuit is a mixture of medicine and law. I know the law but not the medicine. That is why we work with other doctors to determine if the medical treatment was bad.
I can not tell you if you have a case or not because a health care liability lawsuit is a mixture of medicine and law. I know the law but not the... Read More
It is impossible to tell if you have a medical malpractice case on behalf of your baby based on the above, but the fact that your specialist said you should have been seeing him during your pregnancy is a big red flag that you might. The only way to tell is to have your pre-natal medical records and your baby's medical records thoroughly reviewed by an experienced medical malpractice attorney. A malpractice case requires not only that a doctor/doctors made mistakes that violated the standard of care, but also proof to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that your baby would not have had the medical problems she now has if the doctors had sent you to a specialist.
Also very important to keep in mind is the statute of limitations to start a medical malpractice action, which is 2 1/2 years from the time the mistake was made. It is unclear in this situation whether that means the first time your doctor observed the spot on the baby's bladder or later, but to be on the safe side it should be calculated from the time the spot was first observed by your doctors. That can be determined by reviewing the medical records.... Read More
It is impossible to tell if you have a medical malpractice case on behalf of your baby based on the above, but the fact that your specialist said you... Read More