430 legal questions have been posted about discrimination by real users. Ask your question and dive into the knowledge of attorneys who handle your issue regularly. Similar topics to explore also include civil rights. All topics and other states can be accessed in the dropdowns below.
Discrimination Questions & Legal Answers - Page 2
Do you have any Discrimination questions page 2 and need some legal advice or guidance? Ask a Lawyer to get an answer or read through our 430 previously answered Discrimination questions.
Answered 4 years and 9 months ago by Jonas Urba (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Females' pay should not be less than that of males with equal experience, duties, responsibilities. Employers will raise defenses to such a complaint or charge.
An employer's defense may be based on a seniority or merit system which measures the quantity and quality of work or some other "bona fide factor", which might include education, training and experience, but not the male's gender or membership in another protected class such as race, national origin, etc...
You should call some employment lawyers. These claims don't come up that often because employees tend not to share their pay rates with each other. And some fear for their own jobs although retaliation is illegal. Without retaliation protection it would be next to impossible to prove such claims. These claims can be good ones, are rarely slam dunks, and sometimes heavily litigated. We need more facts to make a preliminary analysis. All calls are confidential to protect potential clients considering legal action. All licensed lawyers are bound by state ethics rules applicable to the Bar.... Read More
Females' pay should not be less than that of males with equal experience, duties, responsibilities. Employers will raise defenses to such a complaint... Read More
Answered 5 years ago by Jonas Urba (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Apply for unemployment. Unless you committed gross misconduct you should receive benefits. On the other hand, if you committed gross misconduct you most likely will not.
Maybe pay an employment lawyer to review any agreements, handbooks, policies you were given which might? create a contractual claim. Most of those claims would be under the jurisdiction of small claims court.
1) Apply and secure unemployment, honestly. If they deny you then you will have the chance to timely request a hearing and to present evidence and cross examine witnesses regarding the procedures they claim you did not follow and what reasons they might have for waiting 4 years to tell you that.
2) Consider paying an employment lawyer to read, review, and analyze all of your correspondence, offer letters, employee handbook, etc... to see whether you might have a claim for breach of contract.
3) If you already have the documents and have some basis to believe that an agreement or contract was in fact broken you could try filing a claim in small claims court. The amount potentially owed to you is probably under $10,000 anyway and most of those courts' jurisdiction was raised to $10,000 if I am not mistaken but since I don't appear in those courts I don't know. Check with the clerk of court in your county.
Not legal advice. No lawyer client relationship.... Read More
Apply for unemployment. Unless you committed gross misconduct you should receive benefits. On the other hand, if you committed gross misconduct you... Read More
Answered 5 years and a month ago by Edward J. Dimon (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
You should work with the management company for the landlord. The court system wants to see people who are working towards a solution. Take the new apartment and have them move you. We can help you negotiate if you have issues. Ed Dimon, Esq. 732-797-1600
You should work with the management company for the landlord. The court system wants to see people who are working towards a solution. Take the new... Read More
Answered 5 years and 4 months ago by Jonas Urba (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Apply for the new jobs. Assuming you are the most qualified if they do not hire you maybe they are discriminating. But if they just want to pay everyone less money that might be ok. It's a complicated analysis. Sometimes they are getting rid of older workers, sometimes they are flushing out injured or disabled and sometimes they just want to hire their buddies. The first two reasons are often illegal. The buddies hiring is sometimes perfectly ok. But if employees tried to unionize and those employees are being pushed out that's probably illegal. Call some employment lawyers statewide. There are plenty of us everywhere.... Read More
Apply for the new jobs. Assuming you are the most qualified if they do not hire you maybe they are discriminating. But if they just want to pay... Read More
Answered 5 years and 11 months ago by Nicholas Prescott Weiss (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Most race-based discrimination is based on employment discrimination or a failure to accommodate in a place of public accommodation based on race. Someone generally misidentifying you as the wrong tribe would not fit into one of these (or other categories) and you would not have a cause of action under Ohio law.... Read More
Most race-based discrimination is based on employment discrimination or a failure to accommodate in a place of public accommodation based on race.... Read More
Answered 5 years and 11 months ago by Edward J. Dimon (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
We are in unusual times. The answer before the virus would have been that the employer may not discriminate between employees who have school age children and those who do not. However, the virus is changing the rules of the game. Older employees or employees with compromised health cannot be forced to work. Will the courts rule against an employer who kept people employed and tried to make accomodations for employees with children ? I am not convinced this will happen. This is further complicated by the federal government loan and grant program which encourages employers to keep employees paid even if they sre at home. Ed Dimon, Esq. 732-797-1600 ext 235... Read More
We are in unusual times. The answer before the virus would have been that the employer may not discriminate between employees who have school age... Read More
You may have a case based on the ground of disability (a protected category) for your hearing impairment. Consult with an attorney in your state about contingency fee representation.
You may have a case based on the ground of disability (a protected category) for your hearing impairment. Consult with an attorney in your state... Read More
I'm sorry to hear of your experience. However, the facts are not clear why you resigned. From these facts, it appears you resigned voluntarily and solely based upon a single offending event. Generally, if you just solely made the decision to resign over a single incident instead of seeking to have the employer investigate and resolve, and otherwise seeking recourse through the EEOC or human rights commissions, county or city etc, you would not have a basis to hold your employer liable the loss of your employment and all related damages. If however, you were informed that you either had to tender your resignation or be fired, that would be different. You should consult an employment lawyer and go over all the facts. ... Read More
I'm sorry to hear of your experience. However, the facts are not clear why you resigned. From these facts, it appears you resigned... Read More
Answered 6 years and 4 months ago by Michael J Minenko (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
I would be happy to have an initial free phone consultation to discuss your discrimination matter. Here is my contact information:
Mike Minenko
952-854-1294
mike@minenkolaw.com
I would be happy to have an initial free phone consultation to discuss your discrimination matter. Here is my contact information:
Mike... Read More
Answered 6 years and 4 months ago by Edward J. Dimon (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
The organization would be well served to open the sessions to all attendees. This would avoid any issues with discrimination. I am not sure that this action rises to the level of actual discrimination. One would have to see what actually happened. Ed Dimon, Esq.
The organization would be well served to open the sessions to all attendees. This would avoid any issues with discrimination. I am not sure that this... Read More
Answered 6 years and 9 months ago by Jonas Urba (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Felicia Nestor is a Manhattan lawyer who represents federal employees. Call her or go on the National employment lawyers New York cite and look for federal employee representation. That is a very focused area. Good luck.
Felicia Nestor is a Manhattan lawyer who represents federal employees. Call her or go on the National employment lawyers New York cite and look for... Read More
Without seeing your lease and the notice, I cannot opine on your chance of winning. However, when the petition is served after the 10 days, discrimination is a defense which needs to be asserted and if true, you will win.
Without seeing your lease and the notice, I cannot opine on your chance of winning. However, when the petition is served after the 10 days,... Read More
It is not likely defamation as there is a qualified privilege that likely applies. Even if it is defamation, there appear to be no damages at this point, as you kept your job.
It is not likely defamation as there is a qualified privilege that likely applies. Even if it is defamation, there appear to be no damages at... Read More
If you are allergic to cigarette smoke or even the smell of smoke on smokers, you should make a written request with HR for a reasonable accommodation asking that you not be placed close to a smoker in the work place. If you are retaliated against, you will have a written request already on file. This will help protect you from adverse employment actions.... Read More
If you are allergic to cigarette smoke or even the smell of smoke on smokers, you should make a written request with HR for a reasonable... Read More
Answered 7 years and a month ago by Eric Gene Young (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
In order to answer your question, I would need to know more about the work you do, the business of your boss, and the structure of your work position. Very recently, the California Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling making it harder for employers to classify workers as independent contractors. To classify someone as an independent contractor, businesses must show the worker is free from the control and direction of the employer, performs work that is outside the hirer's core business, and customarily engaged in an "an independently established trade, occupation or business." This last factor is of special significance to the Court because if a worker is not engaged in their own business, there is a "substantial risk" that the hirer has misclassified the worker. A worker may be denied the status of employee "only if the worker is the type of traditional independent contractor, such as an independent plumber or electrician, who would not reasonably have been viewed as working [as an employee] in the hiring business." The Court used a plumber as an example of an independent contractor, while a seamstress working from home to make dresses for a clothing manufacturer from cloth supplied by the company, or a cake decorator who work regularly on custom-designed cakes would be employees.
In summary, three factors are relevant: 1) amount of direction and control the hirer has over the worker; 2) does the worker perform work that is outside the hirer's core business; and 3) is the worker engaged in their own independent business?
I hope this is helpful for you in assessing your situation. Feel free to contact me to discuss further.
... Read More
In order to answer your question, I would need to know more about the work you do, the business of your boss, and the structure of your work... Read More
Answered 7 years and 2 months ago by Edward J. Dimon (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
We need to review the specific facts and what is in the public record. We are doing a similar case now where allegations appeared in the newspaper and the defense is not the perfect is merely repeating what they read in the newspaper. Please call to discuss. Ed Dimon, Esq. 732-797-1600
We need to review the specific facts and what is in the public record. We are doing a similar case now where allegations appeared in the newspaper... Read More
Answered 7 years and 2 months ago by Eric Gene Young (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Frankly, I find this to be atrocious and shocking misconduct by the bus driver. I hope you have at least made an internal complaint to Greyhound. If you have not done so, I would start by following this link here to Greyhound's complaint process.
Frankly, I find this to be atrocious and shocking misconduct by the bus driver. I hope you have at least made an internal complaint to... Read More
Answered 7 years and 2 months ago by Jonas Urba (Unclaimed Profile) |
1 Answer
Sounds like a government job. If so use FOIL. Get copies of all the personnel files of each younger candidate preferred over you. Then take your complete personnel file and those of the successful candidates to an employment lawyer. That lawyer may ask you to FOIL additional documents.
But for your age would you have been the most qualified for each position? Tough cases. Speak with many lawyers as I suggest in you tube videos at employment law reality check.... Read More
Sounds like a government job. If so use FOIL. Get copies of all the personnel files of each younger candidate preferred over you. Then take your... Read More
You may have a case for both sexual harassment and retaliation. Discuss with counsel here in Florida. Most of us take these cases on contingency fee, meaning you dont pay anything unless the case is won, and then the fee comes out of the settlement. Does your company have more than 15 employees?... Read More
You may have a case for both sexual harassment and retaliation. Discuss with counsel here in Florida. Most of us take these cases on contingency fee,... Read More
Answered 7 years and 4 months ago by Edward J. Dimon (Unclaimed Profile) |
2 Answers
I would work with the teacher to have this be a learning experience for all parties. The teacher should be made aware of your circumstances and concerns. Everyone can benefit and make this a positive experience. Ed Dimon, Esq.
I would work with the teacher to have this be a learning experience for all parties. The teacher should be made aware of your circumstances and... Read More